IMO I feel we have one way out of this, we need to claim as much oil as possible first and foremost, if that means we need to stay at war, which I believe is one reason why we are at war, but why not, you need to fight for what you want. Second we need to make nuclear plants everywhere, highly efficient plants are now available and could power America and then some, even if everyone drove plug ins( disposal?-we need to find a way to use the waste or safely send it to space- spend tax money on researching that) once we have the nuke plants set up fill in with nano solar( ), for powering our cars and w. E. Makes your bill cheaper eventually. Electrolysis could also become fossil fuel independent with nuclear power so hydrogen cars could become the new oil combustion engine, what do you guys think i was more or less thinking launching it into venus, its usless anyways in regards to Adam c. Adam I hope you don’t drive a car that runs on gas or use electricity from the main grid, because you are supporting the war by doing this, so prove me wrong and say you dont or stop wasting our time. Well, I have your answer. Due to a steadily rising gas price in 2008 with the US national average price per gallon of regular unleaded gas above $4. 00, there has been a steady movement towards developing higher fuel efficiency and more option energy vehicles for consumers. In response, many smaller companies have rapidly increased research and development into radically different ways of powering consumer vehicles. While Hybrid Vehicles (such as Toyota's Prius) and Electric Vehicles (such as the Tesla Roadster) are commercially available, other technologies such as fuel cells, flywheels, ultracapacitors and a Water-Powered car are starting to emerge as viable options. energy fuelled in ways that don’t use up natural resources or harm the environment energy derived from sources that don’t use up natural resources or harm the environment. energy derived from nontraditional sources (e. G. , compressed natural gas, solar, hydroelectric, wind) energy that is not popularly used and is usually environmentally sound, such as solar or wind energy (as opposed to fossil fuels) Fuel sources that are other than those derived from fossil fuels. Typically used interchangeably for renewable energy. Examples include: wind, solar, biomass, wave and tidal energy.

Who has the technology to retrofit an existing gasoline-fueled internal combustion engine, to run on hydrogen? I know BMW has it, but whoever else? Can it be duplicated without BMW? Why doesn't someone try to fund this and tell everyone else(not sell it), thus driving down oil prices, though also eliminating the need for oil and creating a focus on hydrogen? Most you need is an explosive proof fuel tank – that would have to made out of special material and add more weight to the vehicle. If that were all possible then you would ACTUALLY NEED an SUV or 4×4 to haul something that heavy. 2 in1. No. Do you know what I found? Actually I happened across the plans to convert an existing gas burner to a hydrogen burner. You don't need a hydrogen tank but a water tank. You run the water to an electrolysis chamber where a . 5 – 5 amp pulse, electronically generated, is sent through the water by electrode. The chemical reaction nets hydrogen which is then delivered to the combustion chamber. Nice thing is the byproduct of combustion would be steam or oxygen, helpful not harmful to the atmosphere. Actually the technology in one form or another has been around since the early part of the 1900's. Gov't has just squelched it. I'm in the beginning stages of building one myself. I'd be most delighted to discuss this with more particulars with you. send me an email.

. I was so glad to find this — Several reasons. 1) Where to get the hydrogen. 2) No hydrogen transportation and storate infrastructure. 3) Fuel cells use platinum and thus are extremely expensive. See the link below for further details.